|
Sunday, 13 May 2007 |
 World Net Daily
Posted: May 1, 2007
Was 'Srebrenica genocide' a hoax?
By Aleksandar Pavic
For more than 10 years, the term "Srebrenica" has been used to denote the slaughter of "innocent Muslims" at the hands of Christians – more specifically, the Bosnian Serb army, alleged to have slaughtered, according to the version currently accepted by most major media, "between 7,000 and 8,000 Muslims" when it captured that small town in eastern Bosnia in mid-July 1995. As the story goes, the Bosnian Serbs captured this "U.N.-protected zone" and proceeded to take away and execute thousands of men, women and children in the space of several days, subsequently burying them in mass graves that are still being dug up almost 12 years later.
Belgrade-based historian and researcher, Milivoje Ivanisevic, who has been documenting Yugoslavian civil war casualties for more than a decade, has recently challenged the claims in a new booklet, "The Srebrenica Identity Card," which documents hundreds of bodies buried at the Srebrenica Memorial that were not killed in July 1995, when the alleged genocide took place, including cases of people who died natural deaths a full 13 years before the event took place.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Monday, 30 April 2007 |
|
— IN SEARCH OF TRUTH —
Milivoje Ivanišević
Since 11 July 1995, when the Serbs came back to Srebrenica by force of arms, the same way they were driven away, there have been rumors about a large number of the killed Moslems, primarily innocent Moslem civilians, elderly men, women and children. Over time, the figures were being multiplied to finally become incredible in size making it nowadays possible not only for the Hague Tribunal, Moslem religious and civil authorities, as expected and perhaps logical, but for the officials of other countries as well to talk about genocide. The list contains numerous non-governmental organizations, especially from Sarajevo and Belgrade, financed mostly by Soros, who have been rehashing, multiplying and constantly keeping the issue in the limelight. The dead Moslem fighters of Srebrenica are, now with no blame whatsoever, parts of various combinations of those who have never known them and who nowadays constantly and without any emotional ties laid claim to them and “defend” them. The imposed Srebrenica cult seems to be still keeping watch over our conscience and becoming a metaphor of almost unbelievable and, above all, even genocidal crime of the Serbian people against the innocent citizens of that Bosnian town misplaced in gorges and wilderness.
Is it all true?
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Monday, 30 April 2007 |
|
— IN SEARCH OF TRUTH —
Milivoje Ivanišević
(Continuation)
Local troubles of Srebrenica citizens
There are a lot of testimonies, mostly given by townspeople but also by foreigners coming and staying in the town during the war from May 1992, and especially from 17 April 1993, up to the mid-July 1995, that is until the town was under the protection of the UN. On this occasion we shall mostly take the opinions of Srebrenica people themselves. The experiences of all of them neither speak well about the living conditions in the town nor about the established regime.
According to some of them, the local misunderstandings, quarrels, conflicts and intolerance, were caused by underhand dealings with food distribution and other daily needs, especially with humanitarian aid supplied by road and air. Ordinary people complained that most of it was being taken by those already well-to-do and who came there with a lot of supplies taken from occupied Serbian villages.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Monday, 30 April 2007 |
|
— IN SEARCH OF TRUTH —
Milivoje Ivanišević
(Continuation)
Moslem Victims
Having in mind the purpose of the Memorial Center – mezarje Potocari it would be sensible to have a larger number of buried persons. The reputation of the Memorial Center in the world depends on that, of course among the Moslems. It is not disputable that the Moslem soldiers had casualties during the war. In this case the only question is the number of those who ended their lives breaking the Serbian defending lines and in mutual conflicts, and the number of those killed by a firing squad. The question is the number of the killed in July 1995 and the number of those who lost their lives.
The most disputable question is that the Tribunal has never launched an investigation against those who killed people by a firing squad. Who engaged those soldiers, on what conditions and who gave them protection, even in the USA?[54] Those who did that had influence over the Tribunal. Their arrest and testimonies at the Tribunal would disclose those who ordered the actions. Protecting the perpetrators, the organizer was in fact protecting himself. It is clear evidence that whoever ordered that could not be from the Serb Republic. There are indications that the engaged soldiers were misled and did not trust judiciary who would bring the captured Moslems to justice. It is hard to believe a presupposition that they carried out the action spontaneously and on their own initiative. In that case they would be the only ones to be blamed and fully responsible and the Tribunal would not have any reasons to hesitate and bring charges against them.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 04 April 2007 |
|
Serbian Unity Congress
News in English - site
April 4, 2007
Future historians will undoubtedly have an unpleasant task of assigning large portion of the blame for everything that happened in the Balkans during 1990s to Western politicians, diplomats, mainstream media and officials. Their collective belligerence, ignorance and boorish insistence on ignoring or distorting history in order to create a kind of reality that suits the Western powers’ present interests is most responsible for inflaming the wronged-victim mentality on behalf of Muslim side in the preceding civil wars.
Combined with growing al-Qaeda influence in the Balkans, this perception of being an exclusive victim and “martyr” rather than the instigator of secession which triggered each of the wars in the first place, as well as perpetrator of a number of grizzly war crimes, is bound to result in another bloodshed, as vicious or worse than the preceding civil war in Bosnia.
|
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 13 May 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
